TX home prices: Bubble or no bubble

 Real Estate Market, Residential Mortgage  Comments Off on TX home prices: Bubble or no bubble
Sep 232015
 

For more information, please contact me at (512) 261-1542 or steve@LoneStarLending.com.

by G. Steven Bray

Corelogic released a report last week identifying 14 metros that, in its opinion, are overvalued, and low and behold, 5 of those 14 are in TX. Corelogic defines overvalued markets as those in which prices have increased above the sustainable level based on the metro’s per capita income.

The Austin metro led the pack with prices 42% higher than the sustainable level. The Houston area came in second at 25% overvalued. The Dallas metro came in eighth, San Antonio placed ninth, and Ft. Worth was 12th.

Corelogic claims that the oil and gas boom is responsible for the population and job growth that has pushed up prices and that the current lower oil prices will lead to a bust.

James Gaines at the Texas A&M Real Estate Center disagrees. He acknowledges that home prices in these metros have risen at almost twice their normal rate for the past few years, and he credits the oil and gas boom for some of that increase. However, he notes that supply and demand are very unbalanced at this time with most metros at 3 or fewer months of housing inventory for sale. If demand does fall, these markets have a lot of room to absorb it before they become buyer-dominated.

A further point is that job growth in most TX metros, especially Austin and the DFW area, has been more diversified than in previous oil and gas booms. Tech, telecomm, and health sciences, which have fueled a lot of recent job growth, are unlikely to suffer from declining oil prices.

So, Gaines says, “Bottom line, we don’t think there is really a bubble.”

Do rising rents make homebuying more attractive?

 Real Estate Market  Comments Off on Do rising rents make homebuying more attractive?
Sep 152015
 

For more information, please contact me at (512) 261-1542 or steve@LoneStarLending.com.

by G. Steven Bray

Zillow reports that American renters are now paying 30.2% of their income for rent, the highest percentage in recorded data, which dates back to 1979. This is up almost 1% from last year and much higher than the long-term average of 24.4%. The 30% share is important because above this level economists say housing costs are unaffordable.

On the flip side, the Zillow report says that the average homeowner only spends 15.1% of their income on a housing payment. While that huge gap makes for wonderful marketing fodder, I think the number is questionable. The median home price is about $231,000, and the median income is about $53,000. Even if I grant Zillow that the average homebuyer is able to afford a 20% down payment, I still get a $900 principal and interest payment, which is more than 20% of the homebuyer’s income. And I haven’t even considered property taxes and insurance.

But all real estate is local. In Austin, for example, the median home price is $255k, and the median income is a bit over $52k. Assuming a homebuyer has a 20% down payment, she’s looking at a total housing payment that is more than 35% of her income. The average rent payment in Austin is $1445, which is 33% of her income.

So, while rising rents are a strong incentive for renters to consider buying a home, you may not be able to use a lower housing payment as a deal clincher.